Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855575›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2024

Variation in perceptions of genital ablation between aspiring eunuchs and individuals with paraphilic sexual fantasies.

Jamie Agapoff, Richard J Wassersug, Thomas W Johnson, Erik Wibowo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie AgapoffDepartment of Psychiatry, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96813, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6026-6463
Richard J WassersugDepartment of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7028-7615
Thomas W JohnsonDepartment of Anthropology, California State University-Chico, Chico, CA 95929, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-9217
Erik WibowoDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-1490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although uncommon, some individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) seek voluntary genital ablative procedures, and others fantasize about it. Aim: To learn more about the views of genital ablation and injuries in those who aspire to be castrated as compared with those who only fantasize about it. Methods: A survey was run on the Eunuch Archive internet community. Content analysis was conducted on the responses of 342 AMAB individuals with castration fantasy but no desire for actual surgery (fantasizers) vs 294 AMAB individuals who expressed a desire for genital ablation (aspiring). Outcomes: Study outcomes were responses to open-ended questions about genital ablations and injury. Results: Aspiring individuals were more likely to perceive a "physical appearance benefit" from orchiectomy, but fewer could recall how they first learned about the procedure. Some reasons that aspiring persons gave for desiring an orchiectomy included "achieving preferred self" and "health reasons." Fantasizers, in contrast, worried about the potential side effects of orchiectomy, and more believed there to be no benefit to it. Clinical Implications: Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to understand their patients' views on genital ablation to properly diagnose and provide the best personalized care. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths include a large sample of respondents. Limitations include the accuracy of the anonymous survey data. Conclusions: This study demonstrates divergent interests on genital ablation among AMAB individuals who have not had an any genital ablation yet have intense interest in the topic.

Indexed as

body integrity dysphoriacastrationeunuchsgender dysphoriagender incongruenceparaphilia

Identifiers

PMID38855575
PMCPMC11162831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.