ArticleCureus2024
Clinicopathological Correlation and Recurrence Outcome of Adnexal Involvement on Primary Extramammary Paget's Disease (EMPD).
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: A case study of perianal paget's disease in a patient receiving adjuvant photodynamic therapy post-surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Primary extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare neoplasm that manifests as well-defined erythematous plaques, often misdiagnosed due to its similarity with different dermatoses. It may exhibit invasive features, involving adnexal invasions. The study aims to assess and compare the clinicopathological correlation of primary EMPD with adnexal features. Materials and methodology The monocentric observational retrospective study observed 43 confirmed primary EMPD cases in patients aged 45-95, excluding those with infectious dermatoses, pseudo-tumors, secondary lesions, or survived less than a month. Demographical, clinical and pathological observations were recorded. Expert dermatopathologists, blinded to the initial diagnosis, conducted a comprehensive histopathological evaluation yielding differential pathological diagnosis. Statistical analysis involved Pearson's Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman's Correlations for clinicopathological concordance and adnexal features. Recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, while multivariate recurrence analyses include Cox regression. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant. Results There was a significant association between adnexal involvement and the site of lesion (p < 0.05). There was a significant association (p < 0.05) between involved adnexal depth and primary EMPD subtypes. Adnexal involvement has a significant association with the concordance rates derived from clinicopathological correlations (p < 0.05). Smaller lesions and non-invasive EMPD significantly predict longer recurrence onset (p < 0.01). The primary EMPD subtype was the only independent predictor for recurrence time using the Cox regression model. Conclusion Adnexal proliferation in primary EMPD is considered vital on clinicopathological correlations and recurrence predictions, suggestive of its utility on both diagnosis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.