ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation in anesthetized pigs: a new mode of ventilation for anesthetized veterinary species.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiopulmonary adaptations of a diving marine mammal, the bottlenose dolphin: Physiology during anesthesia.Physiological reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in anesthetized pigs and to describe a new mode of ventilation for anesthetized veterinary species. Study design: Randomized, crossover design without washout. Animals: Twelve healthy, female white Landrace pigs. Methods: Following ketamine-midazolam premedication and anesthetic induction with propofol, the trachea was intubated, and each pig was positioned in dorsal recumbency. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and sufentanil infusions. Pigs were instrumented and their lungs were sequentially ventilated with each mode, in random order, for 1 h according to predefined criteria [fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO Results: Data from 12 pigs were analyzed. A significant effect of mode was found for heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygen delivery index (DO Conclusions: In dorsally recumbent anesthetized pigs, ventilated with FiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.