Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855400›Full record

ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2024

Situational analysis of general practitioners using a forecasting approach until 2025 and a multi-state Markov model: A retrospective longitudinal study.

Azad Shokri, Fereshteh Farzianpour, Elmira Mirbahaeddin, Mahboubeh Bayat, Ali Akbari-Sari, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani, Iraj Harirchi, Somaieh Shokri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Azad ShokriBS, MSc, PhD, Social Determinants of Health Research Center,Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. Email: azad_shokri@yahoo.com.
Fereshteh FarzianpourBS, MSc, PhD, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elmira MirbahaeddinBS, MSc, PhD, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Mahboubeh BayatBS, MSc, PhD, Center for Health Human Resources Research & Studies, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Akbari-SariBS, MSc, PhD, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas Rahimi ForoushaniBS, MSc, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iraj HarirchiMD, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Somaieh ShokriBS, MSc, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Mariwan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mariwan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Undesirable working conditions, insufficient professional development and other labour market pressures have significantly impacted the status of general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to conduct a situational analysis of GPs in Iran using a forecasting approach until 2025. Methods: Data were collected concurrently through direct contact, data matching among databases and tracking among graduates from four clusters of medical science universities over the past decade. This retrospective longitudinal study determined the status of GPs over consecutive years. Multi-state Markov and binary logistic regression analyses were performed using R and Stata 14. Results: Of 430 graduates over the past decade, 94% were successfully identified. Only 20% of the graduates remained active as GPs. The greatest fluctuations in transfer occurred in the third year after graduation, with the remaining proportion of GPs dropping to less than 50%. The probability of remaining as GPs was 0.76 per year, while the highest transition was observed towards specialisation (0.12). Additionally, 2% of the GPs chose not to work, and less than 1% transitioned to a different specialty. Based on the transfer matrix for 2025, only 19% of the GPs were projected to remain, with the majority (59%) transitioning to specialisation. Conclusion: The transfer probability varies across different years, indicating higher flow rates among GPs. However, only a limited number of GPs are projected to remain until 2025. A comprehensive set of interventions should be considered, spanning the pre-medical stage, during education and after graduation, to mitigate the factors contributing to GPs leaving their profession.

Indexed as

General practitionersImmigrationIranUnemployment

Identifiers

PMID38855400
PMCPMC11162533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.