ArticleMinds and machines2024
Find the Gap: AI, Responsible Agency and Vulnerability.
Article in Minds and machines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personal Health Large Language Models and the Negotiation of Medical Authority in Clinical Care: Opportunities, Risks, and Governance.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Do GenAI avatars open new responsibility gaps?AI & society · 2026Article
- Robots and AI are not one moral category: why the distinction matters for ethical and conscious systems.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Mele's Digital Zygote: Developer Responsibility for Neural Networks.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Responsibility Gaps, LLMs & Organisations: Many Agents, Many Levels, and Many Interactions.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Post-biographical dignity in the age of artificial intelligence: Narrative, ePROMs and ethical challenges in end-of-life care.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Review
- Permissibility, Moral Emotions, and Perceived Moral Agency in Autonomous Driving Dilemmas: An Investigation of Pedestrian-Sacrifice and Driver-Sacrifice Scenarios in the Third-Person Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intuitive judgements towards artificial intelligence verdicts of moral transgressions.The British journal of social psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.