Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855267›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2024

Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: Overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future.

Panagiotis Papamichalis, Katerina G Oikonomou, Maria Xanthoudaki, Asimina Valsamaki, Apostolia-Lemonia Skoura, Sophia K Papathanasiou, Achilleas Chovas

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Organ crosstalk and dysfunction in sepsis.Annals of intensive care · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Panagiotis PapamichalisIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece. ppapamih@med.uth.gr.
Katerina G OikonomouIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece.
Maria XanthoudakiIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece.
Asimina ValsamakiIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece.
Apostolia-Lemonia SkouraDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece.
Sophia K PapathanasiouDepartment of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece.
Achilleas ChovasIntensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41221, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) has made remarkable progress over the last few years. Renal replacement therapy, introduced a few decades ago, was the first available application of ECOS. The subsequent evolution of ECOS enabled the enhanced support to many other organs, including the heart [veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), slow continuous ultrafiltration], the lungs (veno-venous ECMO, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), and the liver (blood purification techniques for the detoxification of liver toxins). Moreover, additional indications of these methods, including the suppression of excessive inflammatory response occurring in severe disorders such as sepsis, coronavirus disease 2019, pancreatitis, and trauma (blood purification techniques for the removal of exotoxins, endotoxins, or cytokines), have arisen. Multiple organ support therapy is crucial since a vast majority of critically ill patients present not with a single but with multiple organ failure (MOF), whereas, traditional therapeutic approaches (mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, antibiotics for sepsis, and inotropes for cardiac dysfunction) have reached the maximum efficacy and cannot be improved further. However, several issues remain to be clarified, such as the complexity and cost of ECOS systems, standardization of indications, therapeutic protocols and initiation time, choice of the patients who will benefit most from these interventions, while evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their use is still limited. Nevertheless, these methods are currently a part of routine clinical practice in intensive care units. This editorial presents the past, present, and future considerations, as well as perspectives regarding these therapies. Our better understanding of these methods, the pathophysiology of MOF, the crosstalk between native organs resulting in MOF, and the crosstalk between native organs and artificial organ support systems when applied sequentially or simultaneously, will lead to the multiplication of their effects and the minimization of complications arising from their use.

Indexed as

Blood purificationExtracorporeal organ supportHeart-lung supportKidney-liver replacement therapyMultiple organ support therapyNative–artificial organ crosstalk

Identifiers

PMID38855267
PMCPMC11155504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.