Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855257›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Enhancing early breast cancer diagnosis through automated microcalcification detection using an optimized ensemble deep learning framework.

Jing Ru Teoh, Khairunnisa Hasikin, Khin Wee Lai, Xiang Wu, Chong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing Ru TeohBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khairunnisa HasikinBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Khin Wee LaiBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Malaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-0533
Xiang WuInstitute of Medical Information Security, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chong LiGraduate School, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer remains a pressing global health concern, necessitating accurate diagnostics for effective interventions. Deep learning models (AlexNet, ResNet-50, VGG16, GoogLeNet) show remarkable microcalcification identification (>90%). However, distinct architectures and methodologies pose challenges. We propose an ensemble model, merging unique perspectives, enhancing precision, and understanding critical factors for breast cancer intervention. Evaluation favors GoogleNet and ResNet-50, driving their selection for combined functionalities, ensuring improved precision, and dependability in microcalcification detection in clinical settings. Methods: This study presents a comprehensive mammogram preprocessing framework using an optimized deep learning ensemble approach. The proposed framework begins with artifact removal using Otsu Segmentation and morphological operation. Subsequent steps include image resizing, adaptive median filtering, and deep convolutional neural network (D-CNN) development Results: Based on our analysis, the proposed ensemble model exhibited exceptional performance in the classification of microcalcifications. This was evidenced by the model's average confidence score, which indicated a high degree of dependability and certainty in differentiating these critical characteristics. The proposed model demonstrated a noteworthy average confidence level of 0.9305 in the classification of microcalcification, outperforming alternative models and providing substantial insights into the dependability of the model. The average confidence of the ensemble model in classifying normal cases was 0.8859, which strengthened the model's consistent and dependable predictions. In addition, the ensemble models attained remarkably high performances in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). Conclusion: The proposed model's thorough dataset integration and focus on average confidence ratings within classes improve clinical diagnosis accuracy and effectiveness for breast cancer. This study introduces a novel methodology that takes advantage of an ensemble model and rigorous evaluation standards to substantially improve the accuracy and dependability of breast cancer diagnostics, specifically in the detection of microcalcifications.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDeep learningEarly diagnosisEnsembleMicrocalcification

Identifiers

PMID38855257
PMCPMC11157616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.