Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855253›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Multi-view data visualisation

Theodoulos Rodosthenous, Vahid Shahrezaei, Marina Evangelou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theodoulos RodosthenousDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vahid ShahrezaeiDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marina EvangelouDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-linear dimensionality reduction can be performed by manifold learning approaches, such as stochastic neighbour embedding (SNE), locally linear embedding (LLE) and isometric feature mapping (ISOMAP). These methods aim to produce two or three latent embeddings, primarily to visualise the data in intelligible representations. This manuscript proposes extensions of Student's t-distributed SNE (t-SNE), LLE and ISOMAP, for dimensionality reduction and visualisation of multi-view data. Multi-view data refers to multiple types of data generated from the same samples. The proposed multi-view approaches provide more comprehensible projections of the samples compared to the ones obtained by visualising each data-view separately. Commonly, visualisation is used for identifying underlying patterns within the samples. By incorporating the obtained low-dimensional embeddings from the multi-view manifold approaches into the K-means clustering algorithm, it is shown that clusters of the samples are accurately identified. Through extensive comparisons of novel and existing multi-view manifold learning algorithms on real and synthetic data, the proposed multi-view extension of t-SNE, named multi-SNE, is found to have the best performance, quantified both qualitatively and quantitatively by assessing the clusterings obtained. The applicability of multi-SNE is illustrated by its implementation in the newly developed and challenging multi-omics single-cell data. The aim is to visualise and identify cell heterogeneity and cell types in biological tissues relevant to health and disease. In this application, multi-SNE provides an improved performance over single-view manifold learning approaches and a promising solution for unified clustering of multi-omics single-cell data.

Indexed as

Data clusteringData visualisationManifold learningMulti-modal dataMulti-view data

Identifiers

PMID38855253
PMCPMC11157621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.