Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855213›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Computer-aided colorectal cancer diagnosis: AI-driven image segmentation and classification.

Çağatay Berke Erdaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Çağatay Berke ErdaşComputer Engineering, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is an enormous health concern since it is among the most lethal types of malignancy. The manual examination has its limitations, including subjectivity and data overload. To overcome these challenges, computer-aided diagnostic systems focusing on image segmentation and abnormality classification have been developed. This study presents a two-stage approach for the automatic detection of five types of colorectal abnormalities in addition to a control group: polyp, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, serrated adenoma, adenocarcinoma. In the first stage, UNet3+ was used for image segmentation to locate the anomalies, while in the second stage, the Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer deep learning model was used to predict the type of anomaly after highlighting the anomaly on the raw images. In anomaly segmentation, UNet3+ achieved values of 0.9872, 0.9422, 0.9832, and 0.9560 for Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, Sensitivity, Specificity respectively. In anomaly detection, the Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer model attained a classification performance of 0.9340, 0.9037, 0.9446, 0.8723, 0.9102, 0.9849 for accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, Matthews correlation coefficient, and specificity, respectively. The proposed approach proves its capacity to alleviate the overwhelm of pathologists and enhance the accuracy of colorectal cancer diagnosis by achieving high performance in both the identification of anomalies and the segmentation of regions.

Indexed as

Anomaly classificationColorectal cancerComputer-aided diagnosisDeep learningHistopathologyImage segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38855213
PMCPMC11157578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.