ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Computer-aided colorectal cancer diagnosis: AI-driven image segmentation and classification.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GeriAIGastroNet: AI-Assisted Gastrointestinal Polyp Segmentation and Severity-Based Triage for Tele-Gastroenterology in Underserved Geriatric Populations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Medical Image Processing, Segmentation, and Classification".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is an enormous health concern since it is among the most lethal types of malignancy. The manual examination has its limitations, including subjectivity and data overload. To overcome these challenges, computer-aided diagnostic systems focusing on image segmentation and abnormality classification have been developed. This study presents a two-stage approach for the automatic detection of five types of colorectal abnormalities in addition to a control group: polyp, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, serrated adenoma, adenocarcinoma. In the first stage, UNet3+ was used for image segmentation to locate the anomalies, while in the second stage, the Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer deep learning model was used to predict the type of anomaly after highlighting the anomaly on the raw images. In anomaly segmentation, UNet3+ achieved values of 0.9872, 0.9422, 0.9832, and 0.9560 for Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, Sensitivity, Specificity respectively. In anomaly detection, the Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer model attained a classification performance of 0.9340, 0.9037, 0.9446, 0.8723, 0.9102, 0.9849 for accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, Matthews correlation coefficient, and specificity, respectively. The proposed approach proves its capacity to alleviate the overwhelm of pathologists and enhance the accuracy of colorectal cancer diagnosis by achieving high performance in both the identification of anomalies and the segmentation of regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.