Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855205›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Design of sports training information analysis system based on a multi-target visual model under sensor-scale spatial transformation.

Mei Hu, Ming Zhang, Kewei Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mei HuPhysical Education Department, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming ZhangPhysical Education Department, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, China.
Kewei YuPhysical Education Department, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the contemporary realm of athletic training, integrating technology is a pivotal determinant for augmenting athlete performance and refining training outcomes. The amalgamation of multi-target visual modeling with sensor technology imparts an enriched stratum of sports training data. Subsequently, the sensor scale-space transformation accentuates the comprehensive apprehension of data across diverse scales and angles. Hence, within this manuscript, addressing the multi-target tracking intricacies during sports training and competition, we posit a framework that amalgamates the shortest path elucidated by the K shortest paths (KSP) methodology with the pose information emanating from the Alphapose network. This framework recognizes the athlete's shortest path through a convolutional neural network and KSP, followed by the amalgamation of these divergent data sources. The fusion unfolds by incorporating the athlete's pose information grounded in Alphapose, culminating in a comprehensive integration of the two data streams. Consequently, synthesizing alpha-derived athlete information precipitates the ultimate amalgamation of the two information streams. The accomplished fusion, premised on Alphapose, forms the bedrock for multi-target tracking, culminating in a feature-rich synthesis. Empirical results reveal that after integrating these information streams, the Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA) index and Global Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy (GMOTA) index surpass those of the solitary information tracking methods, thereby furnishing a technical underpinning and a foundation for information fusion within prospective sports training analysis systems.

Indexed as

AlphaposeFeature fusionKSPMultiple objects trackingPhysical training

Identifiers

PMID38855205
PMCPMC11157614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.