ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
An automated information extraction system from the knowledge graph based annual financial reports.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a semantic web-based solution for extracting the relevant information automatically from the annual financial reports of the banks/financial institutions and presenting this information in a queryable form through a knowledge graph. The information in these reports is significantly desired by various stakeholders for making key investment decisions. However, this information is available in an unstructured format making it much more complex and challenging to understand and query manually or even through digital systems. Another challenge that makes the understanding of information more complex is the variation of terminologies among financial reports of different banks or financial institutions. The solution presented in this article signifies an ontological approach to solving the standardization problems of the terminologies in this domain. It further addresses the issue of semantic differences to extract relevant data sharing common semantics. Such semantics are then incorporated by implementing their representation as a Knowledge Graph to make the information understandable and queryable. Our results highlight the usage of Knowledge Graph in search engines, recommender systems and question-answering (Q-A) systems. This financial knowledge graph can also be used to serve the task of financial storytelling. The proposed solution is implemented and tested on the datasets of various banks and the results are presented through answers to competency questions evaluated on precision and recall measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.