Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855197›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: a survey of planning models and machine learning techniques.

Ida Hector, Rukmani Panjanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ida HectorSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rukmani PanjanathanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equipment downtime resulting from maintenance in various sectors around the globe has become a major concern. The effectiveness of conventional reactive maintenance methods in addressing interruptions and enhancing operational efficiency has become inadequate. Therefore, acknowledging the constraints associated with reactive maintenance and the growing need for proactive approaches to proactively detect possible breakdowns is necessary. The need for optimisation of asset management and reduction of costly downtime emerges from the demand for industries. The work highlights the use of Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled Predictive Maintenance (PdM) as a revolutionary strategy across many sectors. This article presents a picture of a future in which the use of IoT technology and sophisticated analytics will enable the prediction and proactive mitigation of probable equipment failures. This literature study has great importance as it thoroughly explores the complex steps and techniques necessary for the development and implementation of efficient PdM solutions. The study offers useful insights into the optimisation of maintenance methods and the enhancement of operational efficiency by analysing current information and approaches. The article outlines essential stages in the application of PdM, encompassing underlying design factors, data preparation, feature selection, and decision modelling. Additionally, the study discusses a range of ML models and methodologies for monitoring conditions. In order to enhance maintenance plans, it is necessary to prioritise ongoing study and improvement in the field of PdM. The potential for boosting PdM skills and guaranteeing the competitiveness of companies in the global economy is significant through the incorporation of IoT, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and advanced analytics.

Indexed as

Anomaly identificationArtificial intelligence algorithmsEnsemble modelsIndustry 4.0Machine learningPlanning modelPredictive maintenanceSemi supervised learning modelsSupervised learning modelsUnsupervised learning models

Identifiers

PMID38855197
PMCPMC11157603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.