Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855072›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Perceived helpfulness of caregiver support resources: Results from a state-wide poll.

Maija Reblin, Natalie Ambrose, Nina Pastore, Sarah Nowak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maija ReblinVermont Conversation Lab, Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Natalie AmbroseVermont Conversation Lab, Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Nina PastoreVermont Conversation Lab, Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Sarah NowakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to identify specific types of services desired by caregivers and determine subgroups most interested in each service type. Methods: Caregiving questions were added to a state-wide poll conducted in a majority-rural state. Those who identified as caregivers ( Results: Top resources caregivers identified as potentially helpful included hands-on services (33.9%), help coordinating care from multiple providers (21.5%), help with finances (18.9%), and help managing emotional stress (17.8%). Only 15% indicated no caregiver resources would be helpful. Younger caregivers endorsed several service domains as more helpful than older caregivers; caregivers reporting higher stress were more likely to endorse most domains as helpful. Conclusion: Data reinforces the overwhelming need to offer caregiver services. Navigation and integrated and tailored service models may be beneficial to help caregivers identify and access appropriate services within healthcare systems. Innovation: This study uses an innovative approach to identifying needs of caregivers, who are often invisible within the healthcare system. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift is needed to broaden the scope and depth of services offered to caregivers.

Indexed as

Care coordinationCaregiverNavigationRuralSocial service

Identifiers

PMID38855072
PMCPMC11157270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.