ReviewJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Cervical spine changes with functional appliance treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional appliances and airway in class II malocclusion : An umbrella review and re-analysis of three meta-analyses.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cervical spine posture is related to craniofacial morphology, airway, gait and body posture. This posture may be influenced by the changes in the mandibular position brought about by functional appliance therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the changes in the cervical spine posture with functional appliance treatment in Skeletal Class II subjects. Methods: A search of studies in six electronic databases - Medline (via Pubmed), the Cochrane Library, OVID, LILACS, Scopus and Web of Science were performed until January 18, 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. Eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was performed with the Newcastle Ottawa scale and Cochrane RoB 2.0. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model for assessment of changes in the cervical spine with removable and fixed functional appliances. Results: Twelve articles that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and nine articles for meta-analysis. Five studies showed a low risk of bias, one as moderate and six as high risk of bias. GRADE assessment revealed a low quality evidence. Meta-analysis revealed a decrease of the upper cervical inclination by 1.16° (95 % CI of -2.68 to 0.35, I Conclusions: Minimal uprighting of the cervical spine was noted with functional appliances. Fixed functional appliances exerted a greater effect than removable functional appliances. Cervical hyperlordosis was reduced with removable functional appliance treatment. Though these changes are minimal, the clinical orthodontist should be aware that functional therapy also influences cervical spine posture. Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, the results are to be considered critically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.