Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855034›Full record

ArticleScientifica2024

Physicochemical Evaluation of Coated Ginger during Long-Term Storage: Impact of Chitosan and Beeswax Bilayer Coatings at Different Temperatures.

Hernani, Christina Winarti, Tatang Hidayat, Abdullah Bin Arif, Sri Yuliani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

HernaniResearch Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-5955
Christina WinartiResearch Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-2245
Tatang HidayatResearch Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-3155
Abdullah Bin ArifResearch Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3552-2875
Sri YulianiResearch Center for Agroindustry, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-3840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh ginger can spoil quickly owing to a variety of factors, including inappropriate postharvest handling, microbial and enzymatic activities, and chemical reactions during storage. This study evaluated the physicochemical properties of ginger coated with chitosan and beeswax during storage for 6 months at different temperatures (18°C and 25°C). Fresh ginger was treated with chitosan coating (1.5 and 3.5%), followed by beeswax coating (3 and 6%). The coated ginger was wrapped in a plastic net and stored at ambient (25°C) and low temperatures (18°C) for six months. The results confirmed that coating treatment slowed down the changes in physicochemical properties (moisture, phenolic content, and so on) of ginger during storage. Ginger stored at 25°C showed shorter shelf lives than those stored at 18°C. Coating ginger with 3% chitosan followed by 6% beeswax exhibited the best results in maintaining the moisture and phenolic content, reducing weight loss, and increasing total soluble solid (TSS) and cell compartment size for six months of storage. This study provides a promising approach to delaying the spoilage of fresh ginger by applying coating treatments useful for developing handling protocols for fresh ginger during storage and distribution.

Identifiers

PMID38855034
PMCPMC11161266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.