Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855026›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Interprofessional Care Models for Pregnant and Early-Parenting Persons Who Use Substances: A Scoping Review.

Kristen Gulbransen, Kellie Thiessen, Natalie Ford, Wanda Phillips Beck, Heather Watson, Patricia Gregory

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen GulbransenUniversity of Manitoba, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7650-6302
Kellie ThiessenUniversity of British Columbia, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-2220
Natalie FordRed Deer Polytech, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2360-1039
Wanda Phillips BeckUniversity of Manitoba, CA.
Heather WatsonMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-8643
Patricia GregoryUniversity of Manitoba, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-070X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Use of substances during pregnancy is a global health concern. Interprofessional care teams can provide an optimal care approach to engage individuals who use substances during the perinatal period. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive summation of published literature reporting on interprofessional care models for perinatal individuals who use substances. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for articles from health-related databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Data were extracted and synthesized to identify the interprofessional care team roles, program and/or provider characteristics, and care outcomes of these models. Results: We screened 645 publications for full text eligibility. Eleven articles met full inclusion criteria and were summarized. Programs were built on co-location of services, partnership with other agencies, available group/peer support and approaches inclusive of cultural care, trauma informed care, and harm reduction principles. Discussion: There is growing evidence supporting integrated care models that are inclusive of relational care providers from multiple health care professions to achieve wraparound care. Conclusions: Many of the interprofessional care models studied have successfully blended social, primary, pregnancy, and addictions care. The success and sustainability of programs varies, and more work is needed to evaluate program and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

birthinterprofessional carepostpartumpregnancysubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38855026
PMCPMC11160395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.