Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854797›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Movement patterns of two reintegrated African elephant (

Tenisha Roos, Andrew Purdon, Victoria Boult, Audrey Delsink, Brett Mitchell, Petrus Johannes Kilian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tenisha RoosElephant Reintegration Trust, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6945-2409
Andrew PurdonM.A.P Scientific Services, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Victoria BoultDepartment of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Audrey DelsinkHumane Society International-Africa, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5899-3370
Brett MitchellElephant Reintegration Trust, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0001-5054-3252
Petrus Johannes KilianElephant Reintegration Trust, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8942-4779

Funding

NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the escalating challenges in captive elephant management, the study of elephant reintegration emerges as a pivotal area of research, primarily addressing the enhancement of animal welfare. The term 'reintegration' refers to the process of rehabilitating captive elephants to a natural system, allowing them to roam freely without intensive human intervention. There is a relative paucity of research addressing the behavioural adaptations post-reintegration, despite reintegration of over 20 elephants across various fenced reserves in South Africa. Our study centres on two distinct herds of reintegrated African elephants, monitoring their movement patterns in two South African reserves over a 57-month period post-release. The primary goal of the study was to establish whether the flexibility and adaptability of movement behaviour of reintegrated elephants can be considered as one of the indicators of determining the success of such an operation. The second aim of our study was to investigate if the reintegrated elephants demonstrated an adaptability to their environment through their hourly, daily, and seasonal ranging patterns after a period of free roaming that exceeded 4 years. Our findings indicated that reintegrated elephants, much like their wild counterparts (movement based on literature), displayed notable seasonal and diurnal variations in key movement parameters, such as utilisation distribution areas and reserve utilization. These patterns changed over time, reflecting an adaptive shift in movement patterns after several years of free roaming. Notably, the trajectory of changes in movement parameters varied between herds, indicating unique adaptation responses, likely resulting from differences in the reintegration process (familiarity of reserve, season of release, presence of wild elephants). Although our study is constrained by the limited number of reintegrated herds available for analysis, it underscores the potential of captive elephants to successfully adapt to a free-living environment, emphasising the promising implications of reintegration initiatives.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareElephantsAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalConservation of Natural ResourcesFemaleMaleSeasonsSouth AfricaAfrican elephantCaptive elephantsMovement patternsReintegrationWelfare

Identifiers

PMID38854797
PMCPMC11162612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.