Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854795›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Fast grassland recovery from viable propagules after reintroducing traditional mowing management on a steep slope.

Susumu Yamada, Wakana Yoshida, Minori Iida, Yoshiko Kitagawa, Jonathan Mitchley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susumu YamadaTokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Wakana YoshidaTokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Minori IidaTokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshiko KitagawaTama Kyuryo Sha, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Jonathan MitchleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands on steep slopes often show high plant species diversity. These grasslands were traditionally maintained through mowing and/or grazing. The traditional management practices help to maintain species diversity, whereas land abandonment reduces diversity by increasing competition from dominant species and reducing seedling recruitment. The reintroduction of management can reverse species diversity declines, but suitable grassland restoration programs are scarce in Japan. To study the effect of short-term abandonment on seedling ecology, we monitored the vegetation of a Susogari grassland that had been abandoned for 3 years; the grassland occupies a steep slope (ca. 50°) on a hillside above paddy fields, and was traditionally mown. We monitored the vegetation before abandonment, in the 3rd year of abandonment, and in the 1st and 2nd years after restoration of mowing management. Emergence and survival of seedlings was monitored for 18 months after reintroduction of management. We monitored 1,183 seedlings of grassland species and non-target annuals in ten 1-m

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesGrasslandSeedlingsJapanPoaceaeSeedling emergenceSeedling establishmentSemi-natural grasslandSurvival rateSusogari grassland

Identifiers

PMID38854795
PMCPMC11162179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.