Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854786›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2024

Let Us Just Ask People What They Think: Community Perceptions and Recommendations about Coronavirus Vaccination.

Christopher Payette, Charlotte Hanby, Maria Cerezo, Seamus Moran, Janice Blanchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher PayetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Charlotte HanbyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Maria CerezoSchool of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Seamus MoranDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Janice BlanchardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite widespread efforts to promote coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in the United States, a significant segment of the population is still unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand attitudes toward the vaccine in patients presenting to an urban emergency department. Methods: We used a qualitative analysis and semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban emergency department from January 18, 2021, to March 14, 2021. Our final sample consisted of 32 people. Results: We found that people trusted their own medical providers rather than popular or political figures. Critiques of the vaccination program highlighted difficulties in navigation and perceptions of inequity. Conclusions: Equitable distribution strategies and honest messaging may facilitate acceptance of the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine. Trustworthy sources for vaccine knowledge should be used to target populations in which vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesPublic OpinionResidence CharacteristicsVaccinationAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth EducationHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthQualitative ResearchUrban PopulationCOVID-19 VaccinesCoronavirusVaccine Hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38854786
PMCPMC11156165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.