Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854711›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2024

Research protocol for an observational health data analysis to assess the applicability of randomized controlled trials focusing on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer using real-world data: PIONEER IMI's "big data for better outcomes" program.

Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Pellegrino, Bertrand De Meulder, Ayman Hijazy, Thomas Abbott, Asieh Golozar, Rossella Nicoletti, Juan Gomez-Rivas, Carl Steinbeisser, Susan Evans-Axelsson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giorgio GandagliaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan.
Francesco PellegrinoDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan.
Bertrand De MeulderAssociation EISBM, Vourles, France.
Ayman HijazyAssociation EISBM, Vourles, France.
Thomas AbbottAstellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL.
Asieh GolozarOHDSI Center, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Rossella NicolettiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Juan Gomez-RivasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Carl SteinbeisserCollaborate Project Management, Munich.
Susan Evans-AxelssonBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan.
James N'DowAcademic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) constitutes ~5% of all new PCa diagnoses in Western countries. For most cases, primary consideration should be given to systemic therapies as the first-line approach based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Despite the importance of RCTs as the pinnacle of evidence in modern medicine, concerns have been raised about their applicability to real-life scenarios. These trials often feature participants who are younger with better performance statuses and prognoses compared to their real-world counterparts. The PIONEER project falls under the Innovative Medicine Initiative's (IMI) "Big Data for Better Outcomes" initiative, aimed at revolutionizing PCa care in Europe. The central focus lies in improving cancer-related outcomes, enhancing health system efficiency, and elevating the quality of health and social care. This study endeavours to evaluate the generalizability of RCT findings concerning newly diagnosed metastatic PCa. Methods: A systematic review of the literature will be conducted to compile patient characteristics from RCTs addressing this subject within the past decade. To create a real-world benchmark, patients with recently diagnosed metastatic PCa from a network of population-based databases will serve as a comparison group. The objective is to assess the applicability of RCT results in two ways. First, a comparison will be made between the characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic PCa enroled in RCTs and those with the same condition included in our databases which might represent the real-world setting. Second, an evaluation will be undertaken to determine the proportion of real-world patients with newly diagnosed metastatic PCa who meet the criteria for RCT enrolment. This study will rely on extensive observational data, primarily sourced from population-based registries, electronic health records, and insurance claims data. The study cohort is established upon routinely gathered healthcare data, meticulously mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

Indexed as

Metastatic prostate cancerprostatic cancerrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID38854711
PMCPMC11161292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.