ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Challenging of ECMO application in pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy: case report of a novel
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) represents a rare cardiovascular disorder stemming from filament-associated genes. Nonetheless, treating RCM presents considerable challenges, particularly concerning device implantation and mechanical support. Furthermore, elucidating the molecular function of specific variants holds promise in benefiting patients and enhancing prognosis, given the significant heterogeneity among RCM variants. Case presentation: The proband, an eight-year-old female, was admitted to our hospital post cardiopulmonary resuscitation due to sudden cardiac arrest. Echocardiography revealed bilateral atrial enlargement. Whole-exome sequencing uncovered a novel heterozygous mutation (c.509G>A, p.R170Q) in TNNI3. Evaluation using the MutationTaster application deemed c.509G>A pathogenic (probability = 0.99). Following clinical manifestations, imaging assessments, and genetic screening, the proband received an RCM diagnosis. ECMO was recommended along with continuous renal replacement therapy. However, persistent atrial flutter ensued post-ECMO withdrawal. Attempts to restore cardiac rhythm with cardioversion, metoprolol, and amiodarone proved futile. Subsequent heart failure led to the patient's demise due to cardiac shock. Based on crystal protein structural analysis, we observed that cTnI-R170Q and R170W exerted similar impacts on protein structural stability and formation. However, both differed significantly from cTnI-R170G, primarily influencing amino acid regions 32-79 and 129-149, involved in TnC and actin binding. Therefore, cTnI-R170Q was revealed to induce RCM via the same molecular mechanism as cTnI-R170W. Conclusion: Managing RCM remains a critical challenge. This study underscores the discouragement of device implantations for cardiac pump functional support in RCM, particularly for non-short-term scheduled HTx. Additionally, considering catheter ablation for atrial fibrosis-induced AFs is recommended. Mechanistically, cTnI-R170Q primarily diminishes troponin-actin interactions and destabilizes thin filaments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.