Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854496›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2024

Emerging strategies for combating

Hongyu Liu, Yunjian Yu, Alideertu Dong, Mahmoud Elsabahy, Ying-Wei Yang, Hui Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. IsGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fujita medical journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The gut microbiota in cancer immunity and immunotherapy.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025
    Review
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongyu LiuState Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes School of Materials Science and Engineering Tiangong University Tianjin P. R. China.
Yunjian YuState Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes School of Materials Science and Engineering Tiangong University Tianjin P. R. China.
Alideertu DongCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Inner Mongolia University Hohhot P. R. China.
Mahmoud ElsabahyDepartment of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Assiut University Assiut Egypt.
Ying-Wei YangInternational Joint Research Laboratory of Nano-Micro Architecture Chemistry College of Chemistry Jilin University Changchun P. R. China.
Hui GaoState Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes School of Materials Science and Engineering Tiangong University Tianjin P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-9999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally characterized by a high prevalence of

Indexed as

antibacterialanti‐biofilmcolorectal cancerdrug resistanceFusobacterium nucleatum

Identifiers

PMID38854496
PMCPMC10867388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.