ArticleChina CDC weekly2024
Advancing Underlying Cause of Death Inference Through Wide and Deep Model.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurately filling out death certificates is essential for death surveillance. However, manually determining the underlying cause of death is often imprecise. In this study, we investigate the Wide and Deep framework as a method to improve the accuracy and reliability of inferring the underlying cause of death. Methods: Death report data from national-level cause of death surveillance sites in Fujian Province from 2016 to 2022, involving 403,547 deaths, were analyzed. The Wide and Deep embedded with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) was developed. Model performance was assessed using weighted accuracy, weighted precision, weighted recall, and weighted area under the curve (AUC). A comparison was made with XGBoost, CNN, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Transformer, and GRU with Attention. Results: The Wide and Deep achieved strong performance metrics on the test set: precision of 95.75%, recall of 92.08%, F1 Score of 93.78%, and an AUC of 95.99%. The model also displayed specific F1 Scores for different cause-of-death chain lengths: 97.13% for single causes, 95.08% for double causes, 91.24% for triple causes, and 79.50% for quadruple causes. Conclusions: The Wide and Deep significantly enhances the ability to determine the root causes of death, providing a valuable tool for improving cause-of-death surveillance quality. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in this field is anticipated to streamline death registration and reporting procedures, thereby boosting the precision of public health data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.