Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854443›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2024

Comparison of the Effects of Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerves Block versus General Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Complication in Patients with Diabetic Foot: A Prospective, Double-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial.

Liyun Zou, Qiufeng Wei, Sining Pan, Fei Xiao, Yage Jiang, Yu Zhong, Yubo Xie

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liyun Zou *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Qiufeng Wei *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Sining Pan *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Fei XiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Yage JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Yu ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Yubo XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7198-7506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perioperative anesthetic management of patients with diabetic foot undergoing surgical treatment is challenging due to their poor cardiovascular health status. According to previous literature, general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block have their own advantages and disadvantages for such patients. We reported the effect of these two anesthesia techniques on perioperative hemodynamics and prognosis in these patients. Methods: This study employed a prospective randomized controlled design, where patients meeting the inclusion criteria were assigned to two groups: the general anesthesia group (GA group) and the peripheral nerve block group (PNB group). The primary outcomes were the differences in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The second outcomes were postoperative numerical rating scale scores, analgesic drug remedies, postoperative sleep conditions monitored by sleep bracelets and health status assessed by EQ-5D-5 L scores. Results: One hundred and nine subjects were enrolled in this study, including 54 in the GA group and 55 in the PNB group. The baseline parameters of the two groups were comparable. The GA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of hypotension, and Colloid intake and total fluid intake were significantly higher in the GA group than in the PNB group. Additionally, a larger proportion of patients in the GA group. The scores of postoperative pain during the 48 hours after surgery were significantly higher, and more patients needed tramadol for postoperative analgesia during the 24 h after surgery in the GA group than in the PNB group. Patients in the PNB group slept better, first feeding time, earlier out-of-bed activity and earlier discharge from the hospital, compared to the GA group. However, there was no obvious difference in postoperative complications between the two groups except pharyngeal pain. Conclusion: Peripheral nerve block is a better option in patients with diabetes undergoing elective below-knee surgery than general anesthesia.

Indexed as

diabetic footgeneral anesthesiahemodynamicperipheral nerve blockpostoperative complicationpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID38854443
PMCPMC11162629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.