ArticleCureus2024
Font Matters: Deciphering the Impact of Font Types on Attention and Working Memory.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Various types of fonts such as serif, sans serif, and script are used during writing and reading, which can affect the reader's attention and working memory, though there is only a subtle difference at the end of the letter. The study aimed to see the effect of font type on working memory and attention. Methods The study included healthy male adults between 18 and 40 years of age. After taking all the necessary precautions, a letter cancellation test and 2-back task in serif, sans serif, and script font types were done to evaluate subjects' attention and working memory. Results A total of 30 subjects participated in the study. The letter cancellation task (LCT) was statistically significant (P<0.05) between the three groups, where the time taken to complete the task was the shortest for serif fonts, indicating heightened attention to serif fonts. However, the accuracy of the N-back test did not show statistically significant differences (P>0.05) among the three font groups, indicating no significant change in working memory. Conclusion The type of font used can impact the reader's attention, with Times New Roman font demonstrating greater attention, particularly in the context of the letter cancellation task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.