ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study Protocol: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Variable Embryo Transfer Compared to Endometrial Receptivity Analysis in Improving Implantation and Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Effects of vaginal microbiota onMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background A descriptive analysis of patients who underwent various embryo transfer methods to address the root cause of their infertility at a tertiary infertility care complex in Wardha, India, is presented herein. This analysis aims to evaluate the management of infertility and assess pregnancy outcomes. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent various embryo transfer methods to address the cause of their infertility, specifically focusing on a variable window of implantation (WOI) at a tertiary infertility clinic over a one-year period. The medical records of 11 patients in both the variable embryo transfer (VET) and control groups were reviewed and analyzed for this article. Results The examination of medical records revealed a significant improvement in the rate of implantation (p-value = 0.04) and clinical pregnancy outcomes (p-value = 0.03) among patients who underwent VET. Comparable statistical outcomes were observed for other variables of pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and biochemical pregnancy rate. Conclusion This retrospective cohort study suggests that the utilization of VET could be a viable option for women experiencing recurrent implantation failure cycles, particularly when an adequate number of embryos are available. This is owing to the challenges in clinically diagnosing a variable WOI. Further studies with a significantly larger sample population are recommended to validate the results and integrate this approach into the standard operating procedures, aiming to enhance the likelihood of pregnancy in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.