Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854327›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Unveiling the Influence of AI Predictive Analytics on Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Diny Dixon, Hina Sattar, Natalia Moros, Srija Reddy Kesireddy, Huma Ahsan, Mohit Lakkimsetti, Madiha Fatima, Dhruvi Doshi, Kanwarpreet Sadhu, Muhammad Junaid Hassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrating AI into infection control: Evaluating the accuracy and consistency of four leading platforms across three regions.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diny DixonMedicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, IND.
Hina SattarMedicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Natalia MorosMedicine, Pontifical Javeriana University Medical School, Bogotá, COL.
Srija Reddy KesireddyMedicine, Sri Venkata Sai Medical College and Hospital, Mahabubnagar, IND.
Huma AhsanMedicine, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, PAK.
Mohit LakkimsettiMedicine, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, IND.
Madiha FatimaMedicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Dhruvi DoshiMedicine, Gujarat Cancer Society Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Ahmedabad, IND.
Kanwarpreet SadhuMedicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, IND.
Muhammad Junaid HassanInternal Medicine, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive literature review explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) predictive analytics on healthcare, particularly in improving patient outcomes regarding disease progression, treatment response, and recovery rates. AI, encompassing capabilities such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making, is leveraged to predict disease progression, optimize treatment plans, and enhance recovery rates through the analysis of vast datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), imaging, and genetic data. The utilization of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in predictive analytics enables personalized medicine by facilitating the early detection of conditions, precision in drug discovery, and the tailoring of treatment to individual patient profiles. Ethical considerations, including data privacy, bias, and accountability, emerge as vital in the responsible implementation of AI in healthcare. The findings underscore the potential of AI predictive analytics in revolutionizing clinical decision-making and healthcare delivery, emphasizing the necessity of ethical guidelines and continuous model validation to ensure its safe and effective use in augmenting human judgment in medical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninghealth caremachine learning (ml)predictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID38854327
PMCPMC11161909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.