ArticleCureus2024
Extra Tree Classifier Predicts an Interactome Hub Gene as HSPB1 in Oral Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral Cancer: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Oral cancer is a significant global health issue that is mainly caused by factors, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, poor oral hygiene, age, and the human papillomavirus. Unfortunately, delayed diagnosis contributes to high rates of illness and mortality. However, saliva shows promise as a potential source for early detection, prognosis, and treatment. By analyzing the proteins and their interactions in saliva, we can gain insights that can assist in early detection and prediction. In this study, we aim to identify and predict the key genes, known as hub genes, in the salivary transcriptomics data of oral cancer patients and healthy individuals. Methods The data used for the analysis were obtained from salivaryproteome.org (https://salivaryproteome.org/) . The retrieved data consisted of individuals with oral cancer who were assigned unique identification numbers (IDs) 1025, 1030, 1027, and 1029, while the healthy individuals were assigned IDs 4256, 4257, 4255, and 4258, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis was used to identify genes that showed significant differences between the two groups. Uniformity and clustering were assessed through heatmaps and principal component analysis. Protein-protein interactions were investigated using the STRING database and Cytoscape. In addition, machine learning algorithms were employed to identify key genes involved in the interatomic interactions by analyzing transcriptomics data generated from the differential gene expression analysis. Results The accuracy and class accuracy of the extra tree classifier showed 98% and 97% in predicting interactomic hub genes, and HSPB1 was identified as a hub gene using Cytohubba from Cytoscape. Conclusion The predictive extra tree classifier, with its high accuracy in analysing interactomic hub genes in oral cancer, can potentially improve diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.