ArticleCureus2024
Safety of Extended Propofol Infusions in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Pharmacovigilance and toxicological studies on safety signals associated with the combined use of propofol and midazolam.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Potentially Hazardous Drugs in the Paediatric ICU: A Narrative Review on the Exemplary Cases of Propofol, Chloramphenicol, and Acetylsalicylic Acid.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perioperative Continuous Propofol Infusion in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A 25-Year Retrospective Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Propofol is a phenol agent with sedative and anesthetic properties that has been in use for decades, but with controversy in critically ill pediatric patients, given the concern for developing propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS). Our aim was to assess the risk of propofol infusions in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at doses and durations greater than the described safety data and its associated covariables. Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of 173 patients receiving propofol in the PICU. Patients were categorized as receiving greater or less than 48-hour infusions. Demographic data and daily clinical variables were recorded for up to seven days post-infusion initiation or until infusion was stopped. Results In this descriptive analysis, patients' demographics were similar, but admission diagnosis was not. Both groups received high mean doses of propofol (>67 mcg/kg/min), with no cases of PRIS observed. The illness severity scores and the need for vasoactive infusion support varied between the cohorts, with higher illness scores and a higher percentage of subjects requiring vasoactive agents in the >48-hour cohort. Finally, there were no major differences in lactate levels or biochemical characteristics between the two groups. Conclusions This study provides pilot data in relation to the feasibility of propofol infusion in critically ill pediatric patients and underscores the need for a larger multicenter study to draw clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.