Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854295›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Triage in Hospital Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.

Samantha Tyler, Matthew Olis, Nicole Aust, Love Patel, Leah Simon, Catherine Triantafyllidis, Vijay Patel, Dong Won Lee, Brendan Ginsberg, Hiba Ahmad and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perception and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in Emergency Medicine: A multi-country study in Sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  6. The Utility of Large Language Models to Assist With Emergency Triage Decisions Within Otolaryngology.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samantha TylerMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Matthew OlisMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Nicole AustMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Love PatelMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Leah SimonMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Catherine TriantafyllidisMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Vijay PatelMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Dong Won LeeMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Brendan GinsbergMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Hiba AhmadMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Robin J JacobsMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in healthcare has become a major point of interest and raises the question of its impact on the emergency department (ED) triaging process. AI's capacity to emulate human cognitive processes coupled with advancements in computing has shown positive outcomes in various aspects of healthcare but little is known about the use of AI in triaging patients in ED. AI algorithms may allow for earlier diagnosis and intervention; however, overconfident answers may present dangers to patients. The purpose of this review was to explore comprehensively recently published literature regarding the effect of AI and ML in ED triage and identify research gaps. A systemized search was conducted in September 2023 using the electronic databases EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science. To meet inclusion criteria, articles had to be peer-reviewed, written in English, and based on primary data research studies published in US journals 2013-2023. Other criteria included 1) studies with patients needing to be admitted to hospital EDs, 2) AI must have been used when triaging a patient, and 3) patient outcomes must be represented. The search was conducted using controlled descriptors from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) that included the terms "artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" AND "emergency ward" OR "emergency care" OR "emergency department" OR "emergency room" AND "patient triage" OR "triage" OR "triaging." The search initially identified 1,142 citations. After a rigorous, systemized screening process and critical appraisal of the evidence, 29 studies were selected for the final review. The findings indicated that 1) ML models consistently demonstrated superior discrimination abilities compared to conventional triage systems, 2) the integration of AI into the triage process yielded significant enhancements in predictive accuracy, disease identification, and risk assessment, 3) ML accurately determined the necessity of hospitalization for patients requiring urgent attention, and 4) ML improved resource allocation and quality of patient care, including predicting length of stay. The suggested superiority of ML models in prioritizing patients in the ED holds the potential to redefine triage precision.

Indexed as

aiclinical decision support systememergency departmentlanguage learning modelmachine learning algorithmsmachine learning (ml)triage care

Identifiers

PMID38854295
PMCPMC11158416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.