ArticleCureus2024
A Study to Assess the Impact of Education on the Knowledge and Attitude Toward Cervical Cancer and HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Vaccination Among Female Healthcare Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Study of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Students from Medical Majors Regarding HPV Infections and HPV Vaccines.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knowledge among parents of daughters towards human papillomavirus attending rural and urban health and training centres of a teaching medical institution in India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- HPV vaccination willingness and behavior among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in low-resource areas of Western China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer ranks among the top five cancers in India, with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 causing up to 70% of related lesions. HPV infection, acquired through various routes, poses risks for both men and women, especially in the age group of 16 to 25 years. Effective prevention is possible through HPV vaccination, with Cervarix and Gardasil approved for use in India. Despite its proven efficacy, HPV vaccine use remains minimal. This study aims to evaluate awareness, willingness, and barriers among female healthcare students while assessing the impact of a health education program on their knowledge and attitude. Methods The present study is an educational interventional study conducted on 489 female students in the healthcare sector in the age group of 19-25 years. Two questionnaires (pre-lecture and post-lecture) were used. After the pre-lecture questionnaire, a session on cervical cancer and vaccine education was delivered by the subject expert. Afterward, the post-lecture questionnaire was given and the impact of session was analyzed using various statistical tools. Result A total of 489 students across MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery), BAMS (Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery), BHMS (Bachelor of Homoeopathic Medicine and Surgery), paramedical, and nursing courses participated in the study. Prior to the lecture, knowledge regarding cervical cancer and vaccines was generally low across subgroups, witnessing improvements ranging from 60% to 100% in various questionnaire sections post-education. Understanding of the importance of a Pap smear (Papanicolaou test) increased significantly from 21% to 79% after the educational session. The most preferred measure to boost coverage was the inclusion of the HPV vaccine in the National Immunization Schedule, with lack of awareness identified as the most significant barrier. Conclusion An educational session not only enhances knowledge but also boosts willingness for cervical cancer vaccination. Inclusion of the vaccine in the National Immunization Schedule not only increases acceptability but also indirectly raises awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.