Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854208›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ambulatory Lumbar Spine Decompression Surgery.

Yusuke Dodo, Ichiro Okano, Neil A Kelly, Leonardo A Sanchez, Henryk Haffer, Maximilian Muellner, Erika Chiapparelli, Lisa Oezel, Gisberto Evangelisti, Jennifer Shue and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yusuke DodoSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Ichiro OkanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo, JPN.
Neil A KellySpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Leonardo A SanchezSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Henryk HafferSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Maximilian MuellnerSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Erika ChiapparelliSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Lisa OezelSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Gisberto EvangelistiSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Jennifer ShueSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Darren R LeblSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Frank P CammisaSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Federico P GirardiSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Alexander P HughesSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Gbolabo SokunbiSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Andrew A SamaSpine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Only a few studies have examined the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on spine ambulatory surgeries and changes in trends. Therefore, we investigated trends during the pre-pandemic period and three pandemic stages in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures in the ambulatory surgery (AMS) setting. Methodology A total of 2,670 adult patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar decompression surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into the following four groups: 1: pre-pandemic (before the pandemic from January 1, 2019, to March 16, 2020); 2: restricted period (when elective surgery was canceled from March 17, 2020, to June 30, 2020); 3: post-restricted 2020 (July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, before vaccination); and 4: post-restricted 2021 (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 after vaccination). Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses as well as retrospective interrupted time series (ITS) analysis were conducted comparing AMS patients in the four periods. Results Patients from the restricted pandemic period were younger and healthier, which led to a shorter length of stay (LOS). The ITS analysis demonstrated a significant drop in mean LOS at the beginning of the restricted period and recovered to the pre-pandemic levels in one year. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that the pandemic was an independent factor influencing the LOS in post-restricted phases. Conclusions As the post-restricted 2020 period itself might be independently influenced by the pandemic, these results should be taken into account when interpreting the LOS of the patients undergoing ambulatory spine surgery in post-restricted phases.

Indexed as

ambulatory spine surgerycovid-19length of staypandemictrends

Identifiers

PMID38854208
PMCPMC11162835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.