ReviewCureus2024
Pediatric Sequential Organ Assessment Score: A Comprehensive Review of the Prognostic Marker in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for septic shock in pediatric respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis based on routine blood biomarkers and concomitant fungal infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Trial
- Mortality risk prediction from dense PICU data from patients with suspected infection: data-derived physiological trajectories outperform expert assessments when temporal resolution is high.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026Article
- Integration of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Lactate for diagnostic and early risk stratification in pediatric sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Neonatal Sepsis as Organ Dysfunction: Prognostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of the nSOFA in the NICU-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictors of in-hospital mortality in children with severe traumatic brain injury.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Pediatric Risk of Mortality-III, Phoenix Sepsis, and pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores for predicting septic shock in Vietnamese children with sepsis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) face a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality, regardless of whether they are in developed or developing countries. To aid in treatment planning, various prognostic scoring systems have been developed to predict the likelihood of morbidity and death in these young patients. While the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score has been validated as an independent risk predictor for adult mortality in cases of confirmed or suspected sepsis, it is not suitable for use in children due to its lack of age normalization. Children in critical condition often exhibit significant deviations from the normal physiological balance of their bodies. These deviations from the typical range of physiological variables can be leveraged to estimate the extent of these variations and create scoring systems. In this context, the pediatric SOFA (pSOFA) score was developed by modifying the original SOFA score and incorporating age-adjusted cutoffs for various bodily systems. The objective of this review is to assess the effectiveness of the pSOFA score in predicting sepsis-related mortality in pediatric patients within the PICU setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.