ArticleResearch square2024
Semi-automated seizure detection using interpretable machine learning models.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the vast number of seizure detection publications there are no validated open-source tools for automating seizure detection based on electrographic recordings. Researchers instead rely on manual curation of seizure detection that is highly laborious, inefficient, error prone, and heavily biased. Here we developed an open-source software called SeizyML that uses sensitive machine learning models coupled with manual validation of detected events reducing bias and promoting efficient and accurate detection of electrographic seizures. We compared the validity of four interpretable machine learning models (decision tree, gaussian naïve bayes, passive aggressive classifier, and stochastic gradient descent classifier) on an extensive electrographic seizure dataset that we collected from chronically epileptic mice. We find that the gaussian naïve bayes and stochastic gradient descent models achieved the highest precision and f1 scores, while also detecting all seizures in our mouse dataset and only require a small amount of data to train the model and achieve good performance. Further, we demonstrate the utility of this approach to detect electrographic seizures in a human EEG dataset. This approach has the potential to be a transformative research tool overcoming the analysis bottleneck that slows research progress.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.