Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854074›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Utilizing tACS to enhance memory confidence and EEG to predict individual differences in brain stimulation efficacy.

Syanah C Wynn, Tom R Marshall, Erika Nyhus

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Syanah C WynnNeuroimaging Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-9772
Tom R MarshallCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-0218
Erika NyhusDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9601-2396

Funding

Identifying the role of theta oscillations in the transient network dynamics involved in episodic memoryR15MH114190 · NIMH · BOWDOIN COLLEGE · PI NYHUS, ERIKA · 2018 to 2018
$395k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH114190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The information transfer necessary for successful memory retrieval is believed to be mediated by theta and gamma oscillations. These oscillations have been linked to memory processes in electrophysiological studies, which were correlational in nature. In the current study, we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to externally modulate brain oscillations to examine its direct effects on memory performance. Participants received sham, theta (4 Hz), and gamma (50 Hz) tACS over frontoparietal regions while retrieving information in a source memory paradigm. Linear regression models were used to investigate the direct effects of oscillatory non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on memory accuracy and confidence. Our results indicate that both theta and gamma tACS altered memory confidence. Specifically, theta tACS seemed to lower the threshold for confidence in retrieved information, while gamma tACS appeared to alter the memory confidence bias. Furthermore, the individual differences in tACS effects could be predicted from electroencephalogram (EEG) measures recorded prior to stimulation, suggesting that EEG could be a useful tool for predicting individual variability in the efficacy of NIBS.

Indexed as

electroencephalography (EEG)episodic memorygamma oscillationsindividual differencestheta oscillationstranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Identifiers

PMID38854074
PMCPMC11160642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.