Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38854049›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context.

Rosa Martinez-Corral, Dhana Friedrich, Robert Frömel, Lars Velten, Jeremy Gunawardena, Angela H DePace

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosa Martinez-CorralDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-3601
Dhana FriedrichDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-9280
Robert FrömelCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, SPAIN.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-8677
Lars VeltenCentre for Genomic Regulation, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, SPAIN.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-5874
Jeremy GunawardenaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-1152
Angela H DePaceDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-0438

Funding

Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Eukaryotic Gene RegulationR01GM122928 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEPACE, ANGELA H, GUNAWARDENA, JEREMY · 2017 to 2024
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, studies have noted that transcription factors (TFs) can behave as either activators or repressors of different target genes. More recently, evidence suggests TFs can act on transcription simultaneously in positive and negative ways. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to define, conceptualize and explore these two aspects of TF action: "duality", where TFs can be overall both activators and repressors at the level of the transcriptional response, and "coherent and incoherent" modes of regulation, where TFs act mechanistically on a given target gene either as an activator or a repressor (coherent) or as both (incoherent). For incoherent TFs, the overall response depends on three kinds of features: the TF's mechanistic effects, the dynamics and effects of additional regulatory molecules or the transcriptional machinery, and the occupancy of the TF on DNA. Therefore, activation or repression can be tuned by just the TF-DNA binding affinity, or the number of TF binding sites, given an otherwise fixed molecular context. Moreover, incoherent TFs can cause non-monotonic transcriptional responses, increasing over a certain concentration range and decreasing outside the range, and we clarify the relationship between non-monotonicity and common assumptions of gene regulation models. Using the mammalian SP1 as a case study and well controlled, synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for incoherent action and activation, repression or non-monotonicity tuned by affinity. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

Indexed as

dualitygene regulationnon-equilibrium regulationnon-monotonicitytranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID38854049
PMCPMC11160767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.