ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Evaluation of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Genomes using Genomic Proximity Mapping.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cytogenetic analysis encompasses a suite of standard-of-care diagnostic testing methods that is routinely applied in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to assess chromosomal changes that are clinically relevant for risk classification and treatment decisions. Objective: In this study, we assess the use of Genomic Proximity Mapping (GPM) for cytogenomic analysis of AML diagnostic specimens for detection of cytogenetic risk variants included in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) risk stratification guidelines. Methods: Archival patient samples (N=48) from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center leukemia bank with historical clinical cytogenetic data were processed for GPM and analyzed with the CytoTerra Results: GPM showed 100% concordance for all specific variants that have associated impacts on risk stratification as defined by ELN 2022 criteria, and a 72% concordance rate when considering all variants reported by the FH cytogenetic lab. GPM identified 39 additional variants, including variants of known clinical impact, not observed by cytogenetics. Conclusions: GPM is an effective solution for the evaluation of known AML-associated risk variants and a source for biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.