Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853877›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

A machine learning-based prediction of tau load and distribution in Alzheimer's disease using plasma, MRI and clinical variables.

Linda Karlsson, Jacob Vogel, Ida Arvidsson, Kalle Åström, Olof Strandberg, Jakob Seidlitz, Richard A I Bethlehem, Erik Stomrud, Rik Ossenkoppele, Nicholas J Ashton and 10 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Linda KarlssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0630-772X
Jacob VogelClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ida ArvidssonCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kalle ÅströmCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Olof StrandbergClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jakob SeidlitzPenn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Richard A I BethlehemUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Erik StomrudClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Rik OssenkoppeleClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Sebastian PalmqvistClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ruben SmithClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Shorena JanelidzeClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Renaud La JoieDepartment of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-8100
Gil D RabinoviciDepartment of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alexa Pichet BinetteClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas Mattsson-CarlgrenClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Oskar HanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gil Dan Rabinovici · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
Reimagining Precision Medicine Approaches to AD DiagnosisR35AG072362 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POSSIN, KATHERINE LAUREL, RABINOVICI, GIL DAN · 2021 to 2025
$4.8M
Prospective validation and implementation of high-performing blood biomarkers and digital cognitive tests for detection of Alzheimer's disease in specialist memory clinic and primary care settingsR01AG083740 · NIA · LUNDS UNIVERSITET · PI Sebastian Palmqvist · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083740NIA NIH HHS R35 AG072362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tau positron emission tomography (PET) is a reliable neuroimaging technique for assessing regional load of tau pathology in the brain, commonly used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and clinical trials. However, its routine clinical use is limited by cost and accessibility barriers. Here we explore using machine learning (ML) models to predict clinically useful tau-PET composites from low-cost and non-invasive features, e.g., basic clinical variables, plasma biomarkers, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results demonstrated that models including plasma biomarkers yielded the most accurate predictions of tau-PET burden (best model: R-squared=0.66-0.68), with especially high contribution from plasma P-tau217. In contrast, MRI variables stood out as best predictors (best model: R-squared=0.28-0.42) of asymmetric tau load between the two hemispheres (an example of clinically relevant spatial information). The models showed high generalizability to external test cohorts with data collected at multiple sites. Based on these results, we also propose a proof-of-concept two-step classification workflow, demonstrating how the ML models can be translated to a clinical setting. This study uncovers current potential in predicting tau-PET information from scalable cost-effective variables, which could improve diagnosis and prognosis of AD.

Identifiers

PMID38853877
PMCPMC11160861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.