Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853568›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Incremental induction of NMDAR-STP and NMDAR-LTP in the CA1 area of ventral hippocampal slices relies on graded activation of discrete NMDA receptors.

Rachael Ingram, Rasa Volianskis, John Georgiou, David E Jane, Adina T Michael-Titus, Graham L Collingridge, Arturas Volianskis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term potentiation: 50 years on: past, present and future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Promiscuous involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the storage ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachael IngramCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5300-4337
Rasa VolianskisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-4878
John GeorgiouLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-6384
David E JaneHello Bio Limited, Cabot Park, Avonmouth, Bristol, UK.
Adina T Michael-TitusCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-6015
Graham L CollingridgeLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9572-5359
Arturas VolianskisCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2047-8269

Funding

CIHRKrembil FoundationThe Royal Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CA1 Region, HippocampalLong-Term PotentiationReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnimalsHippocampusNeuronal PlasticityRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatedorsal hippocampuslong-term potentiationNMDA receptorshort-term potentiationsynaptic plasticityventral hippocampus

Identifiers

PMID38853568
PMCPMC11343233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.