ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024
Synaptic correlates of the corticocortical circuit in motor learning.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engram Synapses and Synapse Dynamics in Memory Processing.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Protein synthesis blockade prevents fear memory reactivation via inhibition of engram synapse strengthening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Long-term potentiation: 50 years on: past, present and future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Synaptic correlates of the corticocortical circuit in motor learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rodents actively learn new motor skills for survival in reaction to changing environments. Despite the classic view of the primary motor cortex (M1) as a simple muscle relay region, it is now known to play a significant role in motor skill acquisition. The secondary motor cortex (M2) is reported to be a crucial region for motor learning as well as for its role in motor execution and planning. Although these two regions are known for the part they play in motor learning, the role of direct connection and synaptic correlates between these two regions remains elusive. Here, we confirm M2 to M1 connectivity with a series of tracing experiments. We also show that the accelerating rotarod task successfully induces motor skill acquisition in mice. For mice that underwent rotarod training, learner mice showed increased synaptic density and spine head size for synapses between activated cell populations of M2 and M1. Non-learner mice did not show these synaptic changes. Collectively, these data suggest the potential importance of synaptic plasticity between activated cell populations as a potential mechanism of motor learning. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Long-term potentiation: 50 years on'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.