Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853552›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Cage effects on synaptic plasticity and its modulation in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Rasa Volianskis, Camilla J Lundbye, Gillian N Petroff, David E Jane, John Georgiou, Graham L Collingridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-term potentiation: 50 years on: past, present and future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Cage effects on synaptic plasticity and its modulation in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rasa VolianskisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-4878
Camilla J Lundbye *Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-4557
Gillian N Petroff *Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5019-8949
David E JaneHello Bio Limited, Cabot Park, Avonmouth, Bristol BS11 0QL, UK.
John GeorgiouLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-6384
Graham L CollingridgeLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9572-5359

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is characterized by impairments in executive function including different types of learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP), thought to underlie the formation of memories, has been studied in the

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeMice, KnockoutNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAnimalsFearHousing, AnimalLong-Term PotentiationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCFCFmr1littermate syndromeLTPNMDAR PAMSTP

Identifiers

PMID38853552
PMCPMC11343313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.