ArticleNursing open2024
Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the ethical awareness scale for nurses working in Iranian intensive care units.
Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical sensitivity questionnaire for nursing students: psychometric properties of the Persian version.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS).BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the ethical awareness scale for nurses working in Iranian intensive care units.Nursing open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe purpose of this study was to translate and validate the ethical awareness scale for nurses working in Iranian intensive care units.
designA cross-sectional psychometric study.
methodsThe study was conducted in Oct 2020 to Sep 2021, involving the participation of 200 ICU nurses. The process included translation of the original version of the ethical awareness scale into Persian, following the World Health Organization guideline, for use in Iran. The translated version was then evaluated for reliability, face validity, content validity ratio, content validity index, convergent validity and construct validity.
resultsThe initial reliability of the scale was established. In qualitative face validity, a few items changed slightly and all items were retained in the quantitative face validity assessment. Based on Lawshe's values, three items were removed from the scale during CVR assessment. All items exhibited acceptable CVI scores. Convergent validity was established with an average variance extracted greater than 0.5. The fit indices, such as CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.01, AGFI = 0.97 and CMIN/DF = 2.99, supported the structural model of the scale. The fit indices for the structural model of the scale were all within acceptable ranges, suggesting that the model fit the data well. Its reliability was confirmed through the test-retest method, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.84 and McDonald's omega coefficient >0.8.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate the Persian version of the ethical awareness scale for Iran (EAS-IR) is comparable in content to the original version, demonstrating its validity and reliability for assessing ethical awareness among Iranian nurses in ICUs. The scale can be a valuable resource for measuring ethical awareness in the Iranian healthcare context and may contribute to improving ethical practices and decision-making in ICU settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: In this project, no patient or public contribution was necessary, because it was not applied to our work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.