ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Influence of Waiting Time Satisfaction on Community Resident's Satisfaction With Medical Institutions: An Extensive Survey of Outpatient Population in Shantou City of Southern China.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an internet-based health examination model for focus populations in the Chinese community: a community demonstration trial.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to perform a nuanced analysis of the multifaceted association between community residents' satisfaction and their perceived satisfaction concerning the visit duration at medical facilities, that could be harnessed to enhance and streamline the process of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, thereby augmenting healthcare outcomes and patient experiences.
methodsRespondents who had utilized services from medical institutions were invited to fill out questionnaires by scanning QR codes. Additionally, surveys also distributed questionnaires through WeChat groups of community residents in densely populated areas of the community, as well as WeChat groups for patients who had previously visited local hospitals. To balance differences between groups, propensity score matching was applied to analyze the contrast between residents satisfied and dissatisfied with their medical visits. After eliminating the interference of confounding factors, a comparative analysis was conducted on the relationship between resident satisfaction and medical institution experience.After eliminating the interference of confounding factors, a comparative analysis was conducted to delve deeply into the relationship between residents' satisfaction and their experiences at medical facilities.
resultsThe study incorporated a large dataset encompassing 2356 community residents. Upon successful propensity score matching, logistic regression analysis elucidated several determinants of overall resident satisfaction. Notably, the grade of the medical institution (χ
conclusionFactors such as the grade of the medical institution, satisfaction related to registration and waiting durations, and travel time to the hospital emerged as crucial determinants shaping community residents' holistic satisfaction with their medical encounters. These findings underscore the exigency for strategic allocation and optimization of medical resources, refinement of the classification system, and enhancement of public health education on the graded diagnosis and treatment schema. The study also demonstrates the value of employing advanced propensity score matching and predictive modelling techniques in health services research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.