Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853199›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Soft tissue vascular tumor-like lesions in adults: imaging and pathological analysis pitfalls per ISSVA classification.

C Marcelin, J Dubois, V Kokta, M F Giroux, M A Danino, S Mottard, G Soulez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C MarcelinDepartment of Adult Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Pellegrin place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France. clement.marcelin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2328-0952
J DuboisDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medecine, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
V KoktaDepartment of Pathology, CHU-Sainte Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.
M F GirouxDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
M A DaninoDepartment of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
S MottardDepartment of Surgery, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux (CIUSS) de l'est de L'ile de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
G SoulezDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Doppler ultrasound (DUS) findings with the pathological findings of soft tissue vascular tumors (STVTs) according to the 2018 ISSVA (International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies) classification to differentiate vascular tumors from vascular malformations.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients with STVTs who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI and pathological analysis at our hospital between 2010 and 2020. The presumptive diagnosis based on the on-site imaging and histological analysis was compared with imaging and histological analysis conducted off-site utilizing the ISSVA criteria.

resultsThis study included 31 patients with 31 vascular tumors located in the head and neck (n = 3), trunk (n = 2), and extremities (n = 26). The off-site pathological analysis confirmed benign vascular tumors in 54.8% of cases (non-involuting congenital hemangioma: 35.5%; epithelioid hemangioma: 13%; pyogenic granuloma: 3%; and spindle cell hemangioma: 3%). Based on the off-site histological analysis, 25.8% were reclassified as having a vascular malformation whereas three had other benign lesions. Only phleboliths were associated with a vascular malformation (p = 0.03). The concordance between off-site MRI and pathological findings was fair (k = 0.3902 (0.0531-0.7274)), whereas that between on-site and off-site pathological analyses was poor (k = -0.0949 (-0.4661 to 0.2763)).

conclusionBenign vascular tumors have non-specific imaging features on imaging with some overlap with atypical vascular malformations. Therefore, histological analysis is recommended. Imaging and pathological analyses should be performed in accordance with the ISSVA classification to minimize inter-observer discrepancies. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Imaging features of benign vascular tumors on MRI are non-specific, leading to discrepancies with pathological findings and potential overlap with atypical vascular malformations. Imaging and histological analyses should be performed in accordance with ISSVA guidelines to improve patient management. KEY POINTS: The imaging features of benign vascular tumors are non-specific. Histological analysis is recommended for soft tissue vascular tumors in adults. Analyses of soft tissue vascular tumors should be performed in accordance with ISSVA guidelines.

Indexed as

Doppler ultrasoundHemangiomaMR imagingSoft tissue neoplasmVascular malformation

Identifiers

PMID38853199
PMCPMC11162993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.