Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853190›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2024

Predicting disease recurrence in breast cancer patients using machine learning models with clinical and radiomic characteristics: a retrospective study.

Saadia Azeroual, Fatima-Ezzahraa Ben-Bouazza, Amine Naqi, Rajaa Sebihi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunohistochemical predictors of local recurrence in breast carcinoma: development and sensitivity validation of an IHC-based risk score.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saadia AzeroualLPHE-Modeling and Simulations, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco. azeroual.saadia1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-196X
Fatima-Ezzahraa Ben-BouazzaFaculty of Sciences and Technology, Hassan First University, Settat, Morocco.
Amine NaqiMohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Casablanca, Morocco.
Rajaa SebihiLPHE-Modeling and Simulations, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal is to use three different machine learning models to predict the recurrence of breast cancer across a very heterogeneous sample of patients with varying disease kinds and stages.

methodsA heterogeneous group of patients with varying cancer kinds and stages, including both triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC), was examined. Three distinct models were created using the following five machine learning techniques: Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Random Under-sampling Boosting (RUSBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machines (SVM), and Logistic Regression. The clinical model used both clinical and pathology data in conjunction with the machine learning algorithms. The machine learning algorithms were combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) imaging characteristics in the radiomic model, and the merged model combined the two types of data. Each technique was evaluated using several criteria, including the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision, recall, and F1 score.

resultsThe results suggest that the integration of clinical and radiomic data improves the predictive accuracy in identifying instances of breast cancer recurrence. The XGBoost algorithm is widely recognized as the most effective algorithm in terms of performance.

conclusionThe findings presented in this study offer significant contributions to the field of breast cancer research, particularly in relation to the prediction of cancer recurrence. These insights hold great potential for informing future investigations and clinical interventions that seek to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of recurrence prediction in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSupport Vector MachineBreast cancerDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)Machine learningMedical physicsRecurrence prediction

Identifiers

PMID38853190
PMCPMC13313866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.