Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38853062›Full record

SynthesisClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2024

Estimated Doses to the Heart, Lungs and Oesophagus and Risks From Typical UK Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer During 2015-2023.

F Holt, A Ivanova, Z Wang, S Darby, F Duane, G Ntentas, S Oliveros, B Lavery, K Shah, A Eichholz and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Author's reply to Rao et al.-"DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation".Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

F HoltNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
A IvanovaNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Ottawa, Canada.
Z WangNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
S DarbyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
F DuaneSt. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network and Trinity St. James' Cancer Institute, Ireland.
G NtentasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
S OliverosNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
B LaveryOxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
K ShahOxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
A EichholzBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK.
D DodwellNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
C TaylorNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: carolyn.taylor@ndph.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risks of heart disease, lung cancer and oesophageal cancer. At present, the best dosimetric predictors of these risks are mean doses to the whole heart, lungs and oesophagus, respectively. We aimed to estimate typical doses to these organs and resulting risks from UK breast cancer radiotherapy.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of planned or delivered mean doses to the whole heart, lungs or oesophagus from UK breast cancer radiotherapy in studies published during 2015-2023. Average mean doses were summarised for combinations of laterality and clinical targets. Heart disease and lung cancer mortality risks were then estimated using established models.

resultsFor whole heart, thirteen studies reported 2893 doses. Average mean doses were higher in left than in right-sided radiotherapy and increased with extent of clinical targets. For left-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 2.0 Gy (range 1.2-8.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 2.7 Gy (range 0.6-5.6 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 2.9 Gy (range 1.3-4.7 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For right-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 1.0 Gy (range 0.3-1.0 Gy) breast/chest wall and 1.2 Gy (range 1.0-1.4 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes. There were no whole heart dose estimates from right internal mammary radiotherapy. For whole lung, six studies reported 2230 doses. Average mean lung doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 2.6 Gy (range 1.4-3.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 3.0 Gy (range 0.9-5.1 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 7.1 Gy (range 6.7-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For whole oesophagus, two studies reported 76 doses. Average mean oesophagus doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 1.4 Gy (range 1.0-2.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 5.8 Gy (range 1.9-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary.

conclusionsThe typical doses to these organs may be combined with dose-response relationships to estimate radiation risks. Estimated 30-year absolute lung cancer mortality risks from modern UK breast cancer radiotherapy for patients irradiated when aged 50 years were 2-6% for long-term continuing smokers, and <1% for non-smokers. Estimated 30-year mortality risks for heart disease were <1%.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEsophagusHeartLungOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesUnited KingdomBreast cancer radiotherapyHeart doseLung doseOesophagus doseRadiotherapy risksUK radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38853062
PMCPMC11511668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.