Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38852906›Full record

Trial reportAcademic pediatrics

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Text Messages to Improve Well-Child Visit Attendance After No-Show.

Beata Debinski, Stephanie S Daniel, Joseph Rigdon, Andrew Mayfield, Tiffany Tzintzun, Katherine A Poehling

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05086237 (Text Message Follow-up for Patients Who Have Missed Well-Child Visits), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05086237 nacompletednot on this map

Text Message Follow-up for Patients Who Have Missed Well-Child Visits: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2022 to 2022Enrolled739ConditionsChild Health, Text MessagingArmsText message reminders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beata DebinskiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine (B Debinski, SS Daniel, and A Mayfield), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC. Electronic address: bdebinsk@wakehealth.edu.
Stephanie S DanielDepartment of Family and Community Medicine (B Debinski, SS Daniel, and A Mayfield), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
Joseph RigdonDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science (J Rigdon), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
Andrew MayfieldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine (B Debinski, SS Daniel, and A Mayfield), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
Tiffany TzintzunPublic Health Corps (T Tzintzun), Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC.
Katherine A PoehlingDepartment of Pediatrics (KA Poehling), Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
J. NRSA Training Core (TL1)TL1TR003136 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TOOZE, JANET A. · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003136NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the effectiveness of text messages to systematically engage parents/guardians ("caregivers") to reschedule a well-child visit (WCV) that was missed ("no-show") and attend that rescheduled WCV visits.

methodsPatients <18 years in one of five pediatrics or family medicine clinics, in one health system in the Southeast US, were eligible. Patients without a rescheduled WCV after a no-show were randomized into intervention (text messages) or care-as-usual comparison, stratified by language (English/Spanish). Enrollment occurred May-July 2022. Up to three text messages were sent to caregivers one week apart via REDCap and Twilio, advising how to reschedule the missed appointment by phone or health portal. Primary outcomes were 1) rescheduling a WCV within 6 weeks of no-show and 2) completing a rescheduled WCV within 6 weeks. Risk differences (RD) and odds ratios (OR) were used to evaluate the effect of text messages.

resultsSeven hundred and twenty patients were randomized and analyzed (texts: 361, comparison: 359). The proportion rescheduling WCV after text versus usual care was English: 18.85% versus 15.02%, respectively, and Spanish: 5.94% versus 8.14%, with overall RD+ 1.98% (95% CI: -1.85, 5.81) and OR 1.21 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.84; P-value .38). Completed WCV rates in text or usual care were English: 13.08% versus 6.59%, and Spanish: 5.81% versus 5.94% with texts associated with RD+ 2.83% (95% CI: 1.66, 4.00) and OR 1.86 (95% CI: 1.09, 3.19).

conclusionText message follow-up after a no-show WCV may positively impact attendance at WCVs rescheduled in the subsequent 6 weeks.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05086237.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAdolescentAppointments and SchedulesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNo-Show PatientsParentsPilot ProjectsReminder Systemshealth care utilizationrandomized controlled trialSpanish languagetext messageswell-child visit

Identifiers

PMID38852906
PMCPMC11620819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.