ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Orbital metastasis or idiopathic orbital pseudotumor? A case report from a patient previously diagnosed with primary breast cancer.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral invasive lobular breast carcinoma with synchronous gastric metastasis and orbital pseudotumor mimicking metastasis: a case report.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Absorbable Haemostatic Artefacts as a Diagnostic Challenge in Postoperative Follow-Up After Oncological Resection in Head and Neck Tumours: Systematic Review of Current Literature and Two Case Reports.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCancer metastatic to the orbit may be difficult to distinguish from idiopathic orbital pseudotumor at clinical and radiological examination. This case report describes clinical, radiological features, differential diagnosis, and treatment options for orbital neoplasms of unknown origin. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 63-year-old woman presented to our Unit because of orbital swelling, ocular pain, globe displacement, conjunctival chemosis, and progressive vision loss. The patient had been seen by an ophthalmologist at another hospital. The initial diagnosis was idiopathic orbital pseudotumor. Steroid therapy did not resolve clinical symptoms. Her medical history held decisive clues: ten years before this presentation she had been diagnosed with double primary breast cancer, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, and invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Orbital biopsy was performed for differential diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Considering the rapid onset and severity of symptoms, the radiological features of the orbit, and the patient's medical history of breast cancer, orbital metastasis should have been the most likely diagnosis. Orbital biopsy was performed because of the history of multiple primary cancers and because metastatic origin had to be determined to define the best treatment strategy.
conclusionBiopsy is necessary under specific circumstances in the diagnosis of orbital metastasis, especially when presentation is ambiguous and when differential diagnosis is challenging. A patient's medical history may hold vital clues to correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.