Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38851683›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Characteristics of duplicated gene expression and DNA methylation regulation in different tissues of allopolyploid Brassica napus.

Weiqi Sun, Mengdi Li, Jianbo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weiqi SunState Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Mengdi LiState Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Jianbo WangState Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China. jbwang@whu.edu.cn.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant polyploidization increases the complexity of epigenomes and transcriptional regulation, resulting in genome evolution and enhanced adaptability. However, few studies have been conducted on the relationship between gene expression and epigenetic modification in different plant tissues after allopolyploidization. In this study, we studied gene expression and DNA methylation modification patterns in four tissues (stems, leaves, flowers and siliques) of Brassica napusand its diploid progenitors. On this basis, the alternative splicing patterns and cis-trans regulation patterns of four tissues in B. napus and its diploid progenitors were also analyzed. It can be seen that the number of alternative splicing occurs in the B. napus is higher than that in the diploid progenitors, and the IR type increases the most during allopolyploidy. In addition, we studied the fate changes of duplicated genes after allopolyploidization in B. napus. We found that the fate of most duplicated genes is conserved, but the number of neofunctionalization and specialization is also large. The genetic fate of B. napus was classified according to five replication types (WGD, PD, DSD, TD, TRD). This study also analyzed generational transmission analysis of expression and DNA methylation patterns. Our study provides a reference for the fate differentiation of duplicated genes during allopolyploidization.

Indexed as

Brassica napusDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, PlantPolyploidyAlternative SplicingEpigenesis, GeneticGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateGenes, PlantBrassica napusDNA methylationDuplicated genesFour tissuesGene expression

Identifiers

PMID38851683
PMCPMC11162574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.