Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38850387›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Benefits of calorie restriction in mice are mediated via energy imbalance, not absolute energy or protein intake.

Daniel L Smith, Sharon E Mitchell, Maria S Johnson, Victoria K Gibbs, Stephanie Dickinson, Beate Henschel, Rui Li, Kathryn A Kaiser, Daniella E Chusyd, Andrew W Brown and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel L Smith *Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1602-2023
Sharon E Mitchell *School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Scotland, Scotland, UK.
Maria S JohnsonDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Victoria K GibbsDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Stephanie DickinsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Beate HenschelDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Rui LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Kathryn A KaiserNutrition Obesity Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-4369
Daniella E ChusydDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Andrew W BrownDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
David B AllisonDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. allison@iu.edu.
John R SpeakmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Scotland, Scotland, UK. j.speakman@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2457-1823
Tim R NagyDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. timrnagy@ymail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-7114

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
Sex hormones and arthritis in a long lived animal modelP30AG050886 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAVID B ALLISON · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
UAB Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GARVEY, W TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
ENERGETICS DISPARITIES & LIFESPAN: A UNIFIED HYPOTHESISR01AG043972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLISON, DAVID B · 2012 to 2016
$8.3M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBG0099531Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBJO200281NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050886NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043972NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caloric restriction (CR) results in reduced energy and protein intake, raising questions about protein restriction's contribution to CR longevity benefits. We kept ad libitum (AL)-fed male C57BL/6J mice at 27°C (AL27) and pair-fed (PF) mice at 22°C (22(PF27)). The 22(PF27) group was fed to match AL27 while restricted for calories due to cold-induced metabolism. The 22(PF27) mice had significantly lower body weight, lean mass, fat mass, leptin, IGF-1, and TNF-α levels than AL27 mice (p<0.001 for all). Manipulations over ~11 weeks resulted in significant differences in body temperature, physical activity, and expression of key genes linked to hunger in the hypothalamus. Survival was significantly greater in 22(PF27) compared to AL27 overall (p<0.001). CR in the context of equivalent energy and protein intake resulted in hormonal, metabolic, and physiological benefits and extended longevity. Hence, energy imbalance, rather than low energy or protein intake per se, mediates the benefits of CR.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismLongevityMice, Inbred C57BLAnimalsBody WeightDietary ProteinsInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILeptinMaleMiceDietary ProteinsInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILeptinAgingAmbient temperatureBody compositionCalorie restrictionLongevityThermoneutral

Identifiers

PMID38850387
PMCPMC11336014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.